Hi all, just curious if there would be any difference in performance or processing if AA2 is used as an insert on an intended channel, as opposed to ARA processing?
I found the ARA workflow a bit clunky in Pro Tools, unintentional channels were being added, and to remove AA2 ARA processing took some effort. AA2 processing works via each method, but I’m curious if the user choose to use it as an insert, what is the best workflow? And at what point should the plug-in be removed as an insert to free up resources? Post removal of AA2, what happens to phase relationships of processed (+ parallel processed) channels during the actual mix down, as most plugins are mixed phase not minimal phase. Should AA2 be applied again post mix down to verify phase coherence?
I am aware that ARA is the new potential path forward for real-time audio processing, and it’s great that Avid have endorsed Sound Radix to be early participants, I am just not that familiar with the ARA workflow just yet. Just curious what workflow may work better for my needs.
Thanks!